I feel quite a sense of achievement and
relief in finishing my most recent read; the 1994 winner. Partly because it was a slog reading
the infamous Glaswegian vernacular (although not wholly consistent!) in its
unbroken form and partly due to the grim reality that it was describing. It wasn’t enjoyable but still
worthwhile as the constant stream of consciousness meant that I was fully
immersed in the mind and inner monologue of a blind, Glaswegian, ex-convict
whether I wanted to or not. It
wasn’t pleasant to spend time with one’s senses so curtailed by the
protagonist, Sammy’s, blindness caused by an injury sustained while in custody
and also the sense of him seemingly being incapable of improving his
situation. The absence of description
of visual stimuli and hence the introspection, was echoed by Sammy’s sense of
isolation from having to defend himself from the hardness of his life, which
was brilliantly conveyed by Kelman.
I found the lack of kindness and compassion
in his existence which had lead to mistrust of others particularly affecting,
especially in his vulnerable state.
When he is approached by the character Ally, who offers to represent him
in compiling a compensation claim, my first reaction was one of suspicion as I
adopted Sammy’s own sense of paranoia about what is going to befall him.
The lack of chapters, paragraphs and
punctuation was an interesting concept, and has made me ponder the reliance on
these conventions. In particular
the lack of chapters was perhaps the most disturbing, as I realised how I
depended on the chunks to form convenient breaks in proceedings to signal a return
to my own narrative reality. Conversely,
I am not a fan of the overuse of the chapter either, where writers use a
cliff-hanger at the end of every chapter to propel the story forward at a
hectic pace. Therefore I guess for
me the best option is the judicial use of the chapter which deserves due
consideration and enhances the nature of the narrative as opposed to being
conspicuous in its presence (or absence).
Overall, this book, despite its tough and repulsive exterior, had a
great deal to offer and was challenging in many different ways and worth
persevering with (although I’m sure many people would and have debated this!).
Onwards I go with the challenge and I
anticipate the 2012 winner shortly with the revealing of the shortlist earlier
this month. I can’t say I was
overly excited about seeing Hilary Mantel’s sequel to Wolf Hall on the list…but
otherwise I am open and interested to discover which book will be joining my
list of Bookers still to read!